Impact player in IPL? Shubman Gill says it dulls the skill and thrill

Gujarat Titans skipper Shubman Gill has joined a growing chorus of Indian cricketers questioning the IPL’s Impact Player rule , describing it as a move that “takes the skill out of the game.”

Speaking after the IPL captains’ meeting in Mumbai on Wednesday, Gill was candid about his concerns over the rule, introduced by the BCCI in 2023 and now extended at least until 2027. The rule allows teams to field an extra batter or bowler at any stage of the game, a strategy designed to increase excitement and flexibility. However, Gill argued that it comes at the cost of cricketing skill.

“Personally for me, I don't think there should be an impact player. Cricket in general is an 11 players' game . Adding an extra batter takes the skill out of the game,” he said.

Gill elaborated on why the traditional format, with limited players, tests true skill: if a few batters get out, the remaining players must adapt, strategise, and still push the team to a competitive score. According to him, chasing challenging totals like 180 on a tricky wicket is far more thrilling than pursuing 220 on a flat pitch with the safety net of an extra player.

Other Indian players, including Rohit Sharma, Hardik Pandya, and Delhi Capitals captain Axar Patel , have previously voiced similar concerns. Gill himself admitted he understands why the rule was introduced but remains unconvinced.

“It's going to be there till 2027. I understand it makes the game more entertaining, but personally, I don't like it. The BCCI will decide what happens after that,” he added.

Gill’s remarks underline a broader debate in Indian cricket circles: should entertainment drive rule changes, or should the essence of the game and its traditional challenges take precedence? For now, the Impact Player rule will continue shaping IPL matches, even as some of the sport’s leading voices call for a rethink.