‘Emerald Island’ at Risk? Thiruvananthapuram Zoo Move Sparks Row

The proposed relocation of the historic Thiruvananthapuram Zoo to Neyyar has triggered a debate over animal welfare, urban development and the heritage value of one of Kerala’s best-known landmarks.

The zoo, which began functioning in 1859, has remained an integral part of the capital’s identity for more than 160 years. The Congress-led UDF government has proposed shifting it to the forest-fringe area of Neyyar, with authorities arguing that a more natural setting could provide better conditions for wild animals.

Former Thiruvananthapuram mayor and CPI(M) leader V K Prasanth has opposed the proposal, describing the zoo as the capital’s “Emerald island”. In a recent Facebook post, he said its extensive greenery, trees, open spaces and biodiversity make it an important part of the city’s environmental and cultural landscape.

According to Prasanth, the zoo attracts around 14 lakh visitors annually and houses more than 1,000 animals belonging to nearly 100 species. He also highlighted its wooded surroundings and natural lake, which support several species of birds and other fauna.

Chief Minister V D Satheesan has suggested shifting the zoo to Neyyar or another forest area and developing the existing site as a major public space, reportedly along the lines of Madison Square in New York. BJP leader and Thiruvananthapuram Corporation Mayor V V Rajesh has also backed relocation, saying it could provide improved facilities for animals and enable the creation of a modern zoological park.

Health Minister K Muraleedharan has said the zoo would be shifted to Neyyar after consultations with stakeholders.

Supporters of the relocation have cited the Thrissur Zoo’s move to Puthur as an example of developing larger, more natural habitats.

Opponents, however, argue that the zoo, museum, galleries, gardens and surrounding greenery form a unique urban heritage landscape that cannot easily be recreated elsewhere.